See the Je-S handbook for full advice on completing applications. The justification of resources, taking up to two A4 sides, should explain the necessity of your requested resources to your research project, including implementing the Impact Plan. The Operations Manager will work closely with Investigators aligned to the NIHR BRC Theme in Infection and AMR (led by Professors Graham Cooke and Wendy Barclay) and will include developing clinical. GTEs will connect directly with the wider Future Observatory: Design the Green Transition programme. If there is significant demand, then we may group the applications by topic and run 2 or more prioritisation panels. Instead, they should describe the impacts on an individuals track record and career development. Download the New Investigator peer review form. If the applicant is applying for a grant which has an interview assessment stage, they should inform EPSRC of any personal circumstances for EPSRC to consider. Elegance of presentation is not, of itself, an assessment criterion for an EPSRC grant. You should note that your review will be sent back, unattributed, to the investigator, who will then be allowed the opportunity to comment on any factual errors and answer any specific queries you have raised. The proposal cover letter should also be used to highlight anything that has been discussed and agreed with EPSRC staff beforehand. A full justification for your assessment of the application should be provided. also acknowledges funding via the . Closing date 24 March 2023. Position type Full time, fixed term. Certainty of outcome is not an indicator of excellence, but neither is an incremental approach necessarily an indicator that a proposal lacks excellence. Those who are seeking to substantially exceed this should consider other funding opportunities. Other issues you might also comment on are the uniqueness (or otherwise) of the collaboration, the value of the contribution of the component you can judge, and the significance of this in terms of future potential development in your own field. If applications to the open funding route and international development funding route are assessed at the same panel they will be ranked on separate rank order lists. Customer Reviews. based at a UK research organisation eligible for EPSRC funding. You should indicate those aspects that you accorded higher or lower priority and why. The scheme only supports UK research organisations, with grants ranging from 100,000 to 300,000 full Economic Cost (fEC) can be awarded. Can be applied for without holding an academic position. You can request funding to support any eligible international collaborative activities, including (but not limited to): As per standard New Investigator Award guidance, you can include co-investigators if the grant crosses disciplinary boundaries and it is demonstrated that they are from a different discipline to the principal investigator. The aim of the scheme is to support them in establishing a research group and developing their own research vision. Quotes should include VAT, delivery charges and incorporate any standard academic discounts. case for support: eight pages two on your track record and six on the scientific case, CVs: up to two A4 sides each only for named postdoctoral staff, researcher- co-investigators (research assistants who have made a substantial contribution to the proposal and will be employed on the project for a significant amount of time), and visiting researchers, letters of support from all project partners included in the Je-S form: no page limit, quotes for equipment above 25,000: no page limit, equipment business case for any items or combined assets with a value above 138,000: up to two pages, technical assessment for the use of any major facilities listed in Je-S guidance: no page limit, a statement of support from your host research organisation: no page limit. Clinical research training fellowship. https://www.ukri.org/councils/epsrc/guidance-for-applicants/types-of-funding-we-offer/new-investigator-award, Contacts for the New Investigator Award scheme, Browse our areas of investment and support, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). The studentship should be provided via funding other than the New Investigator Award grant and may be drawn from the universitys doctoral training partnership or centres for doctoral training. However, prioritisation meetings generally find reviews most useful where they explicitly identify the main strengths and weaknesses in the application, while also giving a clear view on which should be accorded the greater significance and why. For general queries about EPSRC new investigator awards, please contact: Sign up for news, views, events and funding alerts. EPSRC complies with the General Data Protection Regulations 2016/679 (EU) (GDPR). . This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. 1423 . The webinar will last for an hour, it will begin with a presentation from the EPSRC international team and will be followed by an opportunity to ask questions about the funding opportunity. If, in your judgement, it appears that the New Investigator Award is essentially to supplement the student project, this should be assigned a low score and treated as a flawed proposal. To undertake research on an EPSRC funded project targeting the integration of electronic and silicon photonic components. When applying: Select 'documents', then 'new document'. No closing dates apply to the scheme. We process and handle personal information according to these regulations. Planning for activities that maximise the likelihood of any identified impacts occurring is a vital part of research. Unless specified in the call or scheme guidance documentation, EPSRC does not require matched funding, either cash or in kind, to secure funding. You should explicitly consider the amount of time being allocated to the project by the applicant in this assessment. EPSRC Impact Acceleration Account - Funding Opportunity. Impact can take many forms over widely varying timescales. Information on the portfolio is available through EPSRCs Grants on the Web (GoW). Sub-contracting costs can be claimed as an exception to bring in non-standard expertise and is relevant to research and help further the partnership but it needs to be distinguished from a co-investigator. As per standard EPSRC visiting researcher guidelines, funding is limited to 12 months per individual international partner. A full justification for your assessment of the application should be included in each section. Overseas partners at universities, public sector research organisations or publicly funded research cover letter optional attachment (mandatory for New Investigator Award), no page limit, not seen by peer review. If your application is funded, some information from your application will be published through Grants on the Web (GoW), Gateway to Research (GtR) and Visualising our Portfolio (VOP). whether the research programme and associated impact activities have been co-designed with external stakeholders or users: Does the proposal include objectives for impact related activities and are they appropriate to the research? However applicants are not expected to work in isolation but will benefit from support from the university and the environment in which they will be working. It may be that you feel you can only comment with authority on a specific part or component of an application, for example with a multidisciplinary project, or perhaps where there is a strong user-led element. EPSRC recognises that the COVID-19 pandemic has caused major interruptions and disruptions across our communities and is committed to ensuring that individual applicants and their wider team, including partners and networks, are not penalised for any disruption to their career such as breaks and delays, disruptive working patterns and conditions, the loss of ongoing work, and role changes that may have been caused by the pandemic. This should reflect your overall conclusion, and should be consistent with your comments on the individual sections of your review, taking account of all the assessment criteria and the various weightings you applied. Please select the Lead Agency agreement under which you wish to apply. You should comment on how clearly this is described, how appropriate it is for the planned activities, and their scientific and technical feasibility. The international academic project partners must also have an integral role in the proposed work. Applicants are asked to set their proposal in context in terms of the current state of knowledge and other work under way in the field. Read about support available on EPSRC grants for people with caring responsibilities. On Tuesday 25 July 2017 a New Investigator Award scheme replaced the First Grant initiative. The study, published in PLOS ONE, brought together researchers and clinicians at UCL Engineering, UCLH and Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana to investigate a new non-invasive diagnostic technique using smartphone photographs of the eye and face. Include how the research: Reviewers are requested to comment on the applicants ability to deliver the proposed project, making reference to: Appropriateness of the track record of the applicant(s): Balance of skills of the project team, including collaborators: Applicants are required to identify all resources required to undertake the project, and to clearly justify the request. Clearly helping with capacity building is a key role, but we should also . We would expect this to form part of the university support letter. Institutions are required to offer a high level of support to fellows. You are asked to comment on the project plan and management arrangements, which should be proportionate to the scale and complexity of the activity proposed. Consequently, as part of our 2022 to 2025 delivery plan we will provide opportunities for our research and innovation base to connect with international leaders and facilitate joint working between the UK research community and their preferred global partners. Whether they are successful or unsuccessful, applicants who apply for an early career researcher international collaboration grant are still eligible to apply for a New Investigator Award. Include EPSRC ECR International Collaboration Grant open in the subject line. If you do choose to look at this information, it is possible that your anonymity to the applicant will be compromised. EPSRC new investigator award. We will fund 80% of the full economic costs of your project. The changes also mean that some researchers who may have previously been ineligible to . New Investigator Awards are aimed at helping early career academics initiate their own independent research programme. Please provide as full a response as you believe you are qualified to. New Investigator Award. For multidisciplinary applications please state which aspects of the application you feel qualified to assess. For sensitive information the applicant should state clearly whether the information is confidential. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. Americas. Those who are seeking to substantially exceed this should consider other funding mechanisms. Multiple periods of PDRA supervision are likely to be considered holistically in terms of the skills the candidate has had the opportunity to develop, to avoid duplicating the aims of the NIA. . When undertaking your assessment of the research project, you should assess the project as written, noting that any changes that the project might require in the future, which arise from the COVID-19 pandemic, will be resolved as a post-award issue by UKRI if the project is successful. The research excellence of the proposal, making reference to: The ability to deliver the proposed project, making reference to: The effectiveness of the proposed planning and management and whether the requested resources are appropriate and have been fully justified, making reference to: Feedback will not be provided following the prioritisation panel meeting. Applicants are required to identify all resources required to successfully accelerate the creation of impact, and to clearly explain the need for these in the justification of resources. whether the proposal contains a clear vision, addresses a specific challenge or makes a step change in its field, the progress this programme will deliver beyond current state of the art, the intended outputs of the programme, for example, new ideas, tools, techniques, discoveries, and whether these are ambitious but realistic. This question requires an answer. yBirgit van Huijgevoort and Soe Haesaert are with the Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands zOliver Schon and sadegh Soudjani are with Newcastle University, United Kingdom Early career researcher collaborations for global development. This award enables researchers to develop flexible, creative and tailored approaches to increase the impact of their research by building new or developing existing partnerships locally and across the . Please note that while the criteria headings mirror EPSRCs standard criteria, additional aspects have been added to the applicant and partnerships and resources and management criteria, and the applicant and partnerships criterion has been made a primary criterion. RESEARCH FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR NEW INVESTIGATORS . EPSRC will not fund a project if it believes that there are ethical concerns that have been overlooked or not appropriately accounted for. The applicant could present a programme where they are moving into a new discipline, or the programme could bring together expertise and approaches from different disciplines, and in partnership with external organisations. Applications will only be assessed by 1 panel. It should cover the context, importance, methodology and all the associated work and activities you propose to carry out that will make this a high-quality research programme. A risk with part assessment is that it will miss the added value of the overall project (the whole ideally being greater than the sum of the parts) so even where you can only comment with authority on one aspect, it will be helpful to the panel to have your views on how compelling the arguments for the overall application are. EPSRC Reference: EP/W028905/1: Title: Aviation-to-Grid: Grid flexibility through multiscale modelling and integration of power systems with electrified air transport . Research quality (excellence) will always be pre-eminent, and no application can be funded without clearly demonstrating this aspect. For example, for animal research you should comment specifically on the need to use animals, the choice of species and the number of animals it is intended to use. 15 Customer reviews. The content of a paper is more important than publication metrics or the identity of the journal in which it was published, especially for early-stage investigators. You will be given 2 weeks to provide a response to the questions raised by the introducers. The assessment of the expert panel will be shared with you ahead of the prioritisation meeting. They should be completed in single-spaced Arial 11 font or similar-sized sans serif typeface. Your project should typically last one to three years and have a single research vision with clearly defined objectives and outcomes. You should comment on how well this has been done and on the appropriateness of the resources requested. Read the, the spread of applications across EPSRCs remit, the novelty, relationship to the context, timeliness and relevance to identified stakeholders, the ambition, adventure, transformative aspects or potential outcomes, the suitability of the proposed methodology and the appropriateness of the approach to achieving impact. There is no simple definition of excellence. You should use the cover letter to describe how your experience and career history fit with the person eligibility guidance. An NIA is not intended to be an alternative to a fellowship, standard mode grant or other similar funding mechanism. We do not ask peer review to comment on eligibility. Does the proposal specify routine and novel ways to engage end users or partners to help realise impacts? This is mainly assured by requiring that universities have in place and operate appropriate ethical approval processes. Personal award. (15) The Development of Solvent-Free Reductions via . The NIA expectations documentgives some guidelines for applicants to consider during the initial formulation of their proposals with regards to the expected scope and features of their application. https://www.ukri.org/opportunity/epsrc-new-investigator-award, Artificial intelligence and robotics theme, Information and communication technologies theme, Browse our areas of investment and support, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Joint Electronic Submission system (Je-S), new investigator award statement of expectations, new investigator awards: applicant eligibility guidelines, are employed at the submitting research organisation at lecturer level and have not previously received a significant award or led an academic research group. The application should clearly demonstrate the methodology the applicants intend to use to attain their stated objectives, and you should comment on how clearly these are described, how appropriate they are for the planned activity, and their scientific or technical feasibility. They should be completed in single-spaced 11 font Arial or similar sans serif typeface. Different reviewers will have been asked to cover those aspects you cannot, and the panel will then have the job of integrating these different comments. Posted on 14 February 2018. Research grants are open to UK higher education institutions, research council institutes, UKRI-approved independent research organisations, Public Sector Research Establishments and NHS bodies with research capacity. Investigators must be academic employees (lecturer or equivalent) of an eligible organisation. Also, as Je-S does not support all Microsoft Office Word font types, unsupported fonts will be replaced, possibly resulting in layout changes to the document. We expect the majority of your research to fall within our remit. For more information on these EPSRC funding calls, visit the website >>. Site is running on IP address 149.155.59.247, host name 149-155-59-247.uksbs.co.uk ( United Kingdom ) ping response time 10ms Excellent ping . Projects made up of multiple proposals have additional guidance. Please leave enough time for your proposal to pass through your organisations Je-S submission route before this date. Applicants have been advised that their applications should be based on the information available at the point of submission and, if applicable, the known application specific impacts of COVID-19 should be accounted for. whether the proposal articulates a clear understanding of the context and needs of users: Does the proposed research programme consider how these needs will be met? This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. The NIA scheme aims to support individuals who hold an academic lectureship position (or equivalent) and have not previously led an academic research group or been the recipient of a significant grant. EPSRC may reject applications that do not meet attachment format requirements. You can save completed details in Je-S at any time and return to continue your application later. There are 2 parallel funding routes to this funding opportunity: The full economic cost of your project can be up to 200,000 with a duration of up to 2 years. Find out more about providing declarations of interest. on the project details page: new investigator award. There is no page limit, but the statement should be on headed paper, and be signed and dated within six months of the proposal submission date. Think of this as your report to the prioritisation panel, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses you identified in the individual questions and then making a clear and explicit recommendation about whether or not you believe the application warrants funding. Principal Investigator . EPSRC have this week re-launched their grant funding scheme targeted specifically at Early Career Researchers. Designing and developing new in situ synchrotron experiments in collaboration with central facility scientists, including the drafting of . whether the applicant has considered responsible innovation in their research programme. The case for support should describe the proposed research and its intended outcomes. EPSRC therefore allows applicants to tailor the support that they request in order to facilitate this. You should comment here on the adequacy and appropriateness of this proposed university contribution. Creating a Draft Proposal (ESRC example) Costing & Pricing and the Justification for Resources. For equipment in the range 25,000 to 138,000, quotations obtained verbally are acceptable and should be detailed in the proposal.